problemset1solutions_1 - MAS 213: Linear Algebra II....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: MAS 213: Linear Algebra II. Solutions for problem list for Week #1. Tutorial on 7th September. Tutorial problems: Problem 1: (Problem 1.2.13, 1.2.17-19 in [FIS].) Let V denote the set of ordered pairs of real numbers. In the following 4 parts, we are going to attempt to put an R-vector space structure on V by making different definitions of vector addition and scalar multiplication. For each of the following examples, either check that all the axioms hold, or find an axiom which fails to hold. I’ll go through the first part in detail, but will be much quicker with the other parts. Solution to problem 1, part 1. Here we tried to define the operations by ( a 1 , a 2 ) + ( b 1 , b 2 ) = ( a 1 + b 1 , a 2 b 2 ) and c ( a 1 , a 2 ) = ( ca 1 , a 2 ) . I’ll go through each of the axioms as far as possible. The clearest fail is in Axiom VIII. Axiom III fails too, but the explanation there is a bit harder. I. Commutativity is obvious: ( a 1 , a 2 ) + ( b 1 , b 2 ) = ( a 1 + b 1 , a 2 b 2 ) = ( b 1 + a 1 , b 2 a 2 ) = ( b 1 , b 2 ) + ( a 1 , a 2 ). II. Associativity is also obvious: (( a 1 , a 2 ) + ( b 1 , b 2 )) + ( c 1 , c 2 ) = ( a 1 + b 1 , a 2 b 2 ) + ( c 1 , c 2 ) = (( a 1 + b 1 ) + c 1 , ( a 2 b 2 ) c 2 ) = ( a 1 + ( b 1 + c 1 ) , a 2 ( b 2 c 2 )) = ( a 1 , a 2 ) + ( b 1 + c 1 , b 2 c 2 )) = ( a 1 , a 2 ) + (( b 1 , b 2 ) + ( c 1 , c 2 )) 1 III. Existence of a zero? Well, we need an element ( p, q ) such that ( p, q )+ ( x, y ) = ( x, y ) for all pairs ( x, y ). x + p = x and yq = y for all x, y ∈ R . Choosing the zero to be the element (0 , 1) is the only possible choice, and when you make that choice, Axiom III holds. IV. Existence of an additive inverse? This is where it goes wrong for the first time. Our vectors are allowed to have a zero in the second position e.g. ( x, 0), but there is no vector you can add to that (using the definition of addition in this part) to get the zero vector, which has to be (0 , 1). V. This axiom is OK. Scalar multiplication by 1 does not change any vector. VI. Associativity of scalar multiplication is obviously OK. Observe: c 1 ( c 2 ( a 1 , a 2 )) = c 1 ( c 2 a 1 , a 2 ) = ( c 1 ( c 2 a 1 ) , a 2 ) = (( c 1 c 2 ) a 1 , a 2 ) = ( c 1 c 2 )( a 1 , a 2 ) . VII. Distribution in the vector position. This axiom holds. Observe: x (( a 1 , a 2 ) + ( b 1 , b 2 )) = x ( a 1 + b 1 , a 2 b 2 ) = ( x ( a 1 + b 1 ) , a 2 b 2 ) = ( xa 1 + xb 1 , a 2 b 2 ) = ( xa 1 , a 2 ) + ( xb 1 , b 2 ) = x ( a 1 , a 2 ) + x ( b 1 , b 2 ) . VIII. Distribution in the scalar position. This axiom fails . To show that an axiom fails we need to find a particular example where the equation is false. A simple one is the case where the two scalars are x = y = 1 and the vector v = (1 , 2). Then the left hand side of the axiom becomes (1 + 1)(1 , 2) = 2(1 , 2) = (2 , 2). And the right hand side becomes 1(1 , 2) + 1(1 , 2) = (1 , 2) + (1 , 2) = (2 , 2 . 2), which is different....
View Full Document

Page1 / 13

problemset1solutions_1 - MAS 213: Linear Algebra II....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online