englewood cliffs nj 1965 pg 138 ex 54 1 full

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ystem shown below for the values of the masses and spring stiffnesses given. Figure 89.1 Two-mass-spring System Problem Sketch Material Properties m2 = 2m1 = 1.0 lb-sec2/in k2 = k1 = 200 lb/in kc = 4k1 = 800 lb/in ANSYS Verification Manual . ANSYS Release 9.0 . 002114 . © SAS IP, Inc. 1–202 VM89 Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes The spring lengths are arbitrarily selected and are used only to define the spring direction. Two master degrees of freedom (MDOF) are selected at the masses in the spring direction. Results Comparison Target[1] ANSYS Ratio f1, Hz 2.5814 2.5814 1.000 f2, Hz 8.3263 8.3263 1.000 (A1/A2)1[2] 0.92116 0.92116 1.000 (A1/A2)2[2] -2.1711 -2.1712 1.000 1. Solution Recalculated 2. Normal Modes (UX of node 2 / UX of node 3) ANSYS Verification Manual . ANSYS Release 9.0 . 002114 . © SAS IP, Inc. 1–203 VM90: Harmonic Response of a Two-Mass-Spring System Overview Reference: W. T. Thomson, Vibration Theory and Applications, 2nd Printing, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Engle...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/09/2010 for the course DEPARTMENT E301 taught by Professor Kulasinghe during the Spring '09 term at University of Peradeniya.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online