This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: (PLANE42, SOLID45) than it is for quadratic elements (PLANE2, PLANE82, SOLID92, SOLID95). The degradation in performance for linear elements is most pronounced for bending loads coupled
with irregular element shapes. The linear elements experience a locking phenomena due to their inability
to properly account for shear energy in bending resulting in excessive stiffness in the element. The inclusion of extra shape functions in the element formulation helps in correcting the shear energy prediction,
but this is only applicable to rectangular element shapes. Hence results for PLANE42 and SOLID45 in
rectangular form show very acceptable results. 4. Distorted linear elements show more pronounced locking (excessive stiffness) for trapezoidal element
shapes than for parallelogram shapes. Results clearly show underpredicted displacements for
trapezoidal element shapes for PLANE42 and SOLID45. 2–34 ANSYS Verification Manual . ANSYS Release 9.0 . 002114 . © SAS IP, Inc. Benchmark D1
5. The quadratic elements show very good performance under all loadings and geometries. The good
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 12/09/2010 for the course DEPARTMENT E301 taught by Professor Kulasinghe during the Spring '09 term at University of Peradeniya.
- Spring '09
- The Land