This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: = )
and the fixed end of the beam. Figure 5.1 Cantilever Beam Problem Sketch
£ ¤ ¤
¢ Material Properties
E = 30 x 106 psi
υ = 0.0 Geometric Properties
= 50 in
d = 3 in
t = 2 in Loading
F = 4000 lb The PLANE82 model uses the same node numbering at the element corners as the PLANE42 model and has additional midside nodes added to all elements. Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes
Two different solutions are obtained. The first solution uses lower order PLANE42 elements and the second
solution uses higher order PLANE82 elements. The 2 inch thickness is incorporated by using the plane stress
with thickness option. Poisson's ratio is set to 0.0 to agree with beam theory. Results Comparison
Target PLANE82 Ratio at mid-length stress, psi 8,333. 8,163.656 .980 at fixed end stress, psi PLANE42 ANSYS 7,407. 7,151.096 .965 at mid-length stress, psi 8,333. 8,363.709 1.004 ANSYS Verification Manual . ANSYS Release 9.0 . 002114 . © SAS IP, Inc. 1–26 VM5
at fixed end stress, psi 7,407. 7,408.980 1.000 Figure 5.2 Displacement Display ANSYS Verification Manual . ANSYS Releas...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 12/09/2010 for the course DEPARTMENT E301 taught by Professor Kulasinghe during the Spring '09 term at University of Peradeniya.
- Spring '09
- The Land