This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: e
ground node of the transducer are constrained in both the X and Y directions. It should also be noted that the
transducer gap stiffness is much less than the beam stiffness and will not have any effect on the frequency
solution. ANSYS Verification Manual . ANSYS Release 9.0 . 002114 . © SAS IP, Inc. 1–550 VM235 ANSYS Verification Manual . ANSYS Release 9.0 . 002114 . © SAS IP, Inc. 1–551 VM235 Results Comparison
Target ANSYS Ratio Frequency (mode 1) 351699.332 351673.733 1.000 Frequency (mode 2) 1381162.303 1380767.749 1.000 Frequency (mode 3) 3096816.034 3094885.115 1.001 1–552 ANSYS Verification Manual . ANSYS Release 9.0 . 002114 . © SAS IP, Inc. VM236: Hysteresis Calculation of a Beam Under Electrostatic Load
Reference: J. R. Gilbert, G. K. Ananthasuresh, S. D. Senturia, “3D Modeling of Contact
Problems and Hysteresis in Coupled Electro-Mechanics”, MEMS, 1996, pp. 127132. Analysis Type(s): TRANS (ANTYPE = 4) Element Type(s): 2-D Electromechanical Transducer...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 12/09/2010 for the course DEPARTMENT E301 taught by Professor Kulasinghe during the Spring '09 term at University of Peradeniya.
- Spring '09
- The Land