Annotations - Annotations 1. Cambon a. Cambon argues that...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Annotations 1. Cambon a. Cambon argues that Francesca and Paolo’s story is a tragedy, and he analyzes the dynamics and syntax of the speech itself. He brings up the idea, like Freccero, of Francesca’s nobility and breeding through the undertones of the femme’s words. The pause in the whirlwind and Dante’s pause are analogous of each other, and Cambon spends a lot of time analyzing the description of the storm. Francesca’s obsession with the “fiery dawn of love” effects each of her “posthumous speeches” in that “her very discourse constitutes a mimesis of the whirl in which she is eternally caught” (67). The painful birth of poetry from the blind chaos of passion is central to the canto, and the reading of Lancelot de Lac is also key to Francesca’s downfall. Instead of sobering the lovers, the story acts as a contributing factor to the transformation of love to despair. It is also important to note that the Beatrice-Dante dynamic had the potential to become like Paolo-Francesca’s had the couple “yielded to
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 12/12/2010 for the course ENG 217 taught by Professor Bushnell during the Spring '10 term at Naval Academy.

Page1 / 2

Annotations - Annotations 1. Cambon a. Cambon argues that...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online