This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Chem 3502/5502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Fall Semester 2009 Laura Gagliardi Lecture 37, December 14, 2009 (Some material in this lecture has been adapted from Cramer, C. J. Essentials of Computational Chemistry , Wiley, Chichester: 2002; pp. 201-203; 207-210; 216; 220- 222.) Solved Homework With only two CSFs to consider, we determine the energies from H 11 " E H 12 H 21 H 22 " E = The two-by-two determinant is easy to expand: it is E 2 " H 11 + H 22 ( ) E + H 11 H 22 " H 12 2 ( ) = where we’ve replaced H 21 with H 12 (they are equal since H is hermitian). This is a quadratic equation in E , so it has roots determined from the quadratic formula, namely E = H 11 + H 22 ( ) ± H 11 + H 22 ( ) 2 " 4 H 11 H 22 " H 12 2 ( ) 2 = H 11 + H 22 ( ) ± H 11 2 " 2 H 11 H 22 + H 22 2 + 4 H 12 2 2 = H 11 + H 22 ( ) ± H 11 " H 22 ( ) 2 + 4 H 12 2 2 Now consider what this equation says. The two energies are the average of the individual single-determinantal state energies H 11 and H 22 (the part before the ±) plus or minus one-half the square root of the square of the difference between the two state energies plus something that must be non-negative. Note that if H 12 is zero, then the two roots are just H 11 and H 22 , i.e., if there is no off-diagonal coupling between the states, there is no advantage to doing a CI with the two states. But, when it is positive, it will cause the root derived from subtracting the square root term from the average state energy to fall below H 11 . 37-2 So, what is H 12 ? It’s an easy matter to determine given the simplicity of the ground- and excited-state determinants. We evaluate it as H 12 = " 1 ( ) " 2 ( ) H " * 1 ( ) " * 2 ( ) = " 1 ( ) " 2 ( ) 1 r 12 " * 1 ( ) " * 2 ( ) = K "" * All of the one-electron integrals in the expectation value of the Hamiltonian must be zero since if it is a one-electron term for electron 1, the integral over electron 2 is the overlap integral of σ and orthogonal σ *, and if it is a one-electron term for electron 2, the integral over electron 1 must be zero for the same reason. The only term that survives is the electron-electron repulsion integral, which in this case corresponds to the exchange integral between the two orbitals. Limited Configuration Interaction We left off last time considering the structure of the CI matrix H which must be diagonalized to find the improved ground-state energy compared to the HF energy. What if we only keep single excitations? In that case, we see from the last figure in Lecture 37 that the CI matrix will be so-called block diagonal. One “block” will be the HF energy, H 11 , and the other will be the singles/singles region. Since a block diagonal matrix can be fully diagonalized block by block, and since the HF result is already a block by itself, it is apparent that the lowest energy root, i.e., the ground-state HF root, is unaffected by inclusion of single excitations. Indeed, one way to think about the HF process is that it is an optimization of orbitals subject to the constraint that single-...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 12/14/2010 for the course CHEM 3502 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at Minnesota.
- Spring '08