This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: defendants were outside the allowable competition as they intimidated and threatened other workers. Conclusion: Defendants’ acts therefore were unlawful. Implied : Injunction against both physical harm and patrolling should be imposed. 2. Holmes’ rebuttal Justice Holmes stated that if the broader injunction be imposed, that would mean restriction on social interactions with other people and persuasion of other workers, even though neither would be of a violent nature. Holmes emphasized that the majority wrongly assumed that patrol is intrinsically harmful....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 04/04/2008 for the course ILRCB 2010 taught by Professor Lieberwitzr during the Spring '07 term at Cornell.
- Spring '07