Unformatted text preview: The temperate employees’ refusal to work for any firm that produces alcohol was like the defendants’ refusal to work for any firm that hires workers not included in the membership of the defendants’ society. Justification: The defendants’ actions may cause inconvenience to employees who don’t belong to the defendants’ society as well as employers who hire the non-members. However since the defendants are not bound by any contract, they are free to work for whomever and with whomever they wish. Conclusion : The means of the defendants were lawful....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 04/04/2008 for the course ILRCB 2010 taught by Professor Lieberwitzr during the Spring '07 term at Cornell.
- Spring '07