2nd evaluation

2nd evaluation - there. Also, I needed to sound more...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ed Matta Dr. Wingard Writ 100A Response to the Evaluation of the 2 nd Essay I thought this essay was a lot better than the first one I wrote. I thought it really met the requirements and could be one of my best writings in a long time. After each draft I think I improved immensely. The writing center helped out a lot for me during this process. Prior to this assignment I never stepped foot into the writing center. In the end I liked going there because the people there are eager to help me improve as a writer. During this paper I fouled up a lot on the grammar. I did not carefully proofread before I submitted my paper. I didn’t underline the titles of movies and missed some commas here and
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: there. Also, I needed to sound more credible by finding more quotes from an authoritative source so more people could agree with what I am trying to say. Other than that I think I wrote a pretty solid paper. Overall, I think my paper had more strengths than weaknesses. I thought that picking a sports topic will make it easier. I was right. It made my paper very easy to write. I also thought that the way I connected the plot was pretty good. With the exception of surface errors and not including a couple sources, I thought I wrote a pretty good paper....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/15/2010 for the course WRIT 100 taught by Professor Lambinus during the Spring '08 term at Moravian.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online