Chap014 - Chapter 14 Efficient and Equitable Taxation...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Chapter 14 – Efficient and Equitable Taxation Chapter 14 – Efficient and Equitable Taxation 1. Assuming that all other commodities (except for cable and satellite television) were untaxed, then optimal tax policy suggests the commodities should be taxed according to the inverse elasticity rule. Goolsbee and Petrin (2001) find that the elasticity of demand for basic cable service is -0.51, and the demand for direct broadcast satellites is -7.40. Applying the inverse elasticity rule would imply that (t BASIC /t SATELLITE )=(η SATELLITE / η BASIC )=(7.40/0.51)=14.5 . Thus, tax rates on basic cable should be 14.5 times higher than tax rates on satellite television because basic cable is inelastically demanded, while demand for satellite television is highly elastic. Among the assumptions that go into the inverse elasticity rule are that goods are neither complements nor substitutes, and that the elasticities are the Hicksian compensated elasticities rather than the Marshallian uncompensated elasticities. In this case, it is likely that the first of these assumptions is false – basic cable and satellite television are likely substitutes for each other. The Hicksian and Marshallian demand elasticities are likely to be close to each other because the income effects are likely to be small for this commodity. 2. Although the tax schedule is progressive, the incidence is not clear at all. This is determined by the relative demand and supply elasticities for expensive cars. One may argue that behavior will be distorted only at the margin, and hence demanders largely bear the burden. However, administration of this tax would not be straightforward: One could imagine methods of evasion such as misrepresenting invoices or selling the car in parts! 3. The beard tax was progressive because it was a function of social position. It’s hard to know about the efficiency consequences unless one knows more about the price elasticity of demand for the privilege of having a beard. If the elasticity was small, then it would be an efficient tax. However, conventional notions of horizontal equity suggest that the tax was unfair. 4.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 12/18/2010 for the course ECON 2003 taught by Professor Tong during the Fall '10 term at Uni. Southampton.

Page1 / 4

Chap014 - Chapter 14 Efficient and Equitable Taxation...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online