{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

ex3ab04 - Language of evaluation 1-3(3 pts each We wish to...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Language of evaluation 1-3) (3 pts each) We wish to test the model that the incidence of gonorrhea declines after beer taxes are raised . For the following possible data, which consequences (A, B, C) apply? Note that this question is not about causation versus correlation, only about data and a model that happens to describe a correlation. (MTF) A) The data are inconsistent with the model B) The data are irrelevant to the model C) The data support the model 1) Data: 20 spins on a roulette wheel, 15 are Red A B C 2) Data: In two separate instances, the incidence of hepatitis B infections was unchanged after beer taxes were raised. (Hepatitis B is not gonorrhea.) A B C 3) Data: In two separate instances, the incidence of gonorrhea was unchanged after beer taxes were raised. A B C 4) ( 12 pts ) The following points pertain to the book and lecture on evaluation. Which statements are true? (MTF). (A) Data are considered inconsistent with models because all models are false. (B) Classifying data as irrelevant to a model means that the data could not possibly refute it no matter how they turned out. (C) Classifying data as irrelevant to a model means that the data were not gathered according to the Ideal Data template. (D) In considering guilt versus innocence of a suspect in a crime, the law specifies that we adopt the view that the suspect is considered innocent until proven guilty (consider this statement true). The model of innocence is an example of a null model because it is the model we accept until evidence forces us to reject it. (E) In science and in many aspects of society, our willingness to reject a null model increases as evidence accumulates against that model. For example, in class, our acceptance of the safety of a vaccine (against the null model that the vaccine was not safe) increased as the sample of successful trials increased. (F) In a Pepsi versus Coca-Cola taste test, one would use either null model that Pepsi tastes best or that Coca- Cola tastes best. (G) By definition, once a model has been accepted, that model cannot be refuted in further tests. (H) The criteria for acceptance of a model are rigid in science and society, and there is little legitimate room for disagreement as to whether a model should be accepted or not. (I) A null model is part of every properly designed study. If the study does not have a null model, then it is not properly designed.
Image of page 1

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Correlations
Image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern