CERD+Case

CERD+Case - CERD Case Arguments Dartmouth 2K9 Will Marcal...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: CERD Case Arguments Dartmouth 2K9 Will Marcal BQH 1 CERD- systemic impact..........................................................................................................................................2 CERD bad- Asian Instability (1/2)..........................................................................................................................3 CERD bad- Asian Instability (2/2)..........................................................................................................................4 CERD= education impact........................................................................................................................................5 CERD fails- Pakistan...............................................................................................................................................6 Plenary Powers Good- solvency..............................................................................................................................7 Plenary Powers Good-Congress likes......................................................................................................................8 Plenary Powers Good- Solvency- terrorism............................................................................................................9 Last printed 1 CERD Case Arguments Dartmouth 2K9 Will Marcal BQH 2 CERD- systemic impact CERD fails- systemic violations to indigenous people Mr. Torsten Schackel , Prof at Sacramento state college, 20 09 , http://www.forestpeoples.org/documents/asia_pacific/india_ne_cerd_req_feb09_eng.pdf This short report is respectfully submitted to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (the Committee) by the United NGOs Mission Manipur, a network of 235 indigenous peoples organisations from northeast India, and the Forest Peoples Programme, an international NGO (the submitting organisations). The submitting organisations previously transmitted reports to the Committee concerning the situation of the indigenous peoples in northeast India on 31 October 2006, 10 January 2008 and 07 July 2008. 1 Those reports detailed systematic discrimination and other human rights violations against the indigenous peoples of northeast India , which are especially manifest in relation to the 1958 Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA); Indias ongoing failure to recognize and secure indigenous peoples property, political, and other rights; and its active violation of indigenous peoples rights in connection with the extant and imminent construction of some 68 mega-dams throughout indigenous peoples territories in that region . This present report calls further attention to the dangerous and urgent situation that persists and has intensified in northeast India as a result of Indias discriminatory acts and omissions . For instance, and as discussed below, ....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/20/2010 for the course K 101 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '10 term at UMass Lowell.

Page1 / 9

CERD+Case - CERD Case Arguments Dartmouth 2K9 Will Marcal...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online