Framework+for+Abe

Framework for Abe - We meet we adopt a policy of problemativing the affirmative CI The negative whould get counterplans and kritik alternatives we

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1. We meet we adopt a policy of problemativing the affirmative 2. CI The negative whould get counterplans and kritik alternatives- we solve your offense we still get policy making education 3. Kritiks disprove the justification for the plan- a bad starting point means policymaking education is flawed, doesn’t moot 1ac, win solvency and it just becomes a question of impact calculus. Schram, Professor of Social Policy at Bryn Mawr, 93 (Sanford F. Schram, Postmodern Policy Analysis: Discourse and Identity in Welfare Policy , August 1993, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4532290 ) Modernist perspectives in social thought, such as the dominant policy ana- lytical paradigm in particular, takes the material constitution of society as given . The discursive practices in which state actors are centrally implicated are not seen as important factors in producing and reproducing that material reality. Poverty, for instance , is viewed as a pre-existing problem . The decline of the two-parent family, to take another
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 12/20/2010 for the course K 101 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '10 term at UMass Lowell.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online