Hegemony-Updates

Hegemony-Updates - Hegemony Low The unipolar moment is overObama recognizes it Bhadrakumar Career Diplomat 09(M K Bhadrakumar Career Diplomat in

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The unipolar moment is over—Obama recognizes it. Bhadrakumar, Career Diplomat, ‘09 (M. K. Bhadrakumar, Career Diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service, 7/11/09, http://www.atimes.com/atimes/ Central_Asia/KG11Ag01.html Such bitter political legacy apart, the mode of Russian foreign policy too has shifted to a "proactive type" in comparison with the "reactive type" of policy, as was the case when NATO dismembered Yugoslavia or the US occupied Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003. Equally, Russia, like the rest of the world, is conscious that the US's "unipolar moment" has ended and that Obama too probably realizes the futility of any attempt to preserve the colossal inertia of "unipolarity" in political or psychological terms. Thus, the summit in Moscow provided an extraordinary pageantry to outline or to give greater definition to the promised reset in US-Russian relations. The world’s moved on—hegemony’s over. Sanders, Chair of Peace and Conflict Studies at Berkley, ‘09 (Jerry W. Sanders, Chair of Peace and Conflict Studies at Berkley, Author of “Peddlers of Crisis: The Committee of the Present Danger and politics of Containment,” 11/1/09, http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071119/sanders/) This may seem to be good news for Democrats , but their complacency and their caution thus far suggest otherwise--and could prove their undoing. If they have been quick to denounce neoconservative fantasies of empire for having alienated much of the world, their nostalgia for a return to the hegemony of the Truman--or perhaps Kennedy, or even Clinton era--is itself a prescription for a world , and a United States, that no longer exists. True, the Democrats wish to reinvigorate diplomacy and lessen dependence on military force. They also spin out visions of a grand alliance of democracies and offer a nod to multilateralism, promising to consult with those they insist must once again fall dutifully behind America's rightful lead. While the distinction between neoconservative claims to empire and liberal hegemony may be appreciated by academic theorists and policy wonks, the difference of these two approaches may escape a world grown deeply distrustful of US intentions and an American public impatient to chart a new course, not merely tinker with the old one. The world has not stood in place during the past decade waiting for the Democrats to retake the White House and reassert their own brand of dominance. What might have seemed
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 12/20/2010 for the course K 101 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '10 term at UMass Lowell.

Page1 / 4

Hegemony-Updates - Hegemony Low The unipolar moment is overObama recognizes it Bhadrakumar Career Diplomat 09(M K Bhadrakumar Career Diplomat in

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online