LO-food-stamps-neg

LO-food-stamps-neg - LO Food Stamps Neg Dartmouth 2K9...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: LO Food Stamps Neg Dartmouth 2K9 Daniel Park 1 Food Stamps Neg Strategy Sheet...............................................................................................................................6 1NC – T: Pov = Fed Pov Line.....................................................................................................7 A.Definitions – Poverty is defined by the Federal Poverty Line.........................................................................7 OCPP, Oregon Center for Public Policy, 09........................................................................................................7 OCPP, Oregon Center for Public Policy, “Federal Government Issues New Poverty Line for 2009,” January 23, 2009, http://www.ocpp.org/cgi-bin/display.cgi?page=nr20090123Povert [Tom].......................7 For declares the targets of social services............................................................................................................7 Cambridge University Press p.334.................................................................................................................7 B. Violation – The Food stamps allow up to 130% of the poverty line..............................................................7 C.Standard - Limits..............................................................................................................................................7 1.Failure to limit eligibility to persons in poverty explodes the topic – every government policy affects persons in poverty. That kills depth of education................................................................................................7 2.Ground – universal counterplans and criticisms of the federal poverty line are core negative ground ...........7 3. Xtra-T – allowing any plan that affects a population that is not ALL at or below the federal poverty line justifies affs that affect one person below the line and all Americans who are above the line. All parts of the plan must be topical.............................................................................................................................................7 4. Contextuality – Our definition of poverty is the most predictable limit because it’s defined by the resolutional actor .................................................................................................................................................7 D. Voter for education and fairness.....................................................................................................................7 1NC Increase isn’t Removing a Barrier.....................................................................................8 A. Increase is direct growth not removing a barrier............................................................................................8 1NC – Nutrition............................................................................................................................91NC – Nutrition....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/20/2010 for the course K 101 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '10 term at UMass Lowell.

Page1 / 60

LO-food-stamps-neg - LO Food Stamps Neg Dartmouth 2K9...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online