Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional, International Edition, 11th Edition by Joh

Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice
Professional, International Edition, 11th Edition by
John N. Ferdico – Test Bank
To Purchase this Complete Test Bank with Answers Click the
link Below
-
edition-11th-edition-by-john-n-ferdico-test-bank/
If face any problem or Further information contact us At
[email protected]
Sample Test
TEST BANK
Multiple Choice
1. The common law approach to applying the Fourth Amendment to
particular cases was to focus on:
1. whether the subjective privacy rights of the individual had been
violated.
2. whether law enforcement used force during a search and/or
seizure.
3. whether the government agent intentionally violated the
constitutional protection.
4. whether there was a physical intrusion into a constitutionally
protected area.

ANS: D REF: 96 LO: 1
2. The change from viewing the Fourth Amendment as law that protected
property to a view that the law protected persons was prompted by
cases that concerned:
3. The Katz v. United States (1967) case is known for establishing that:
4. The Katz v. United States (1967) case, while shifting the Fourth
Amendment inquiry from property rights to privacy rights, did not result
in a lot of reversals of previously decided cases. Why were there not a
lot of reversals following the decision?

5. The U.S. Supreme Court has defined the term “search” to occur when:
1. there is a meaningful interference with an individual’s possessory
interests in property.
2. an individual has a subjective expectation of privacy and the
expectation of privacy has been infringed upon.
3. an individual has a subjective expectation of privacy that society is
prepared to consider reasonable and the privacy expectation is
infringed.
4. an officer collects any evidence against a person regardless of
circumstance.
ANS: C REF: 97-100 LO: 2