{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Ecology_example - 1 The FACTOR Procedure Initial Factor...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–6. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1 The FACTOR Procedure Initial Factor Method: Maximum Likelihood Prior Communality Estimates: SMC grade moist dock acar chey glyc lars cryp psoc 0.33503944 0.45499985 0.23850409 0.10786071 0.25234462 0.31596140 0.41044427 0.11466990 0.17043474 Preliminary Eigenvalues: Total = 3.60340214 Average = 0.40037802 Eigenvalue Difference Proportion Cumulative 1 3.22852154 2.36126459 0.8960 0.8960 2 0.86725695 0.43397155 0.2407 1.1366 3 0.43328540 0.23823513 0.1202 1.2569 4 0.19505027 0.17827358 0.0541 1.3110 5 0.01677670 0.12972367 0.0047 1.3157 6 -.11294697 0.17563764 -0.0313 1.2843 7 -.28858461 0.03966041 -0.0801 1.2042 8 -.32824502 0.07946711 -0.0911 1.1131 9 -.40771213 -0.1131 1.0000 1 factor will be retained by the NFACTOR criterion. Iteration Criterion Ridge Change Communalities 1 0.5206577 0.0000 0.1863 0.23632 0.64126 0.11043 0.09657 0.23524 0.22369 0.40241 0.03601 0.10810 2 0.5201740 0.0000 0.0138 0.24897 0.64085 0.12110 0.09786 0.22143 0.23471 0.39964 0.03717 0.09793 3 0.5201440 0.0000 0.0041 0.24921 0.64495 0.12211 0.09728 0.22036 0.23321 0.39671 0.03694 0.09849 4 0.5201404 0.0000 0.0010 0.25009 0.64566 0.12285 0.09719 0.21935 0.23298 0.39584 0.03696 0.09834 5 0.5201399 0.0000 0.0004 0.25030 0.64604 0.12307 0.09714 0.21908 0.23284 0.39547 0.03696 0.09834 Convergence criterion satisfied. Significance Tests Based on 165 Observations Test DF Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq H0: No common factors 36 267.4854 <.0001 HA: At least one common factor H0: 1 Factor is sufficient 27 82.9623 <.0001 HA: More factors are needed
Image of page 1

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
2 The FACTOR Procedure Initial Factor Method: Maximum Likelihood Chi-Square without Bartlett's Correction 85.302948 Akaike's Information Criterion 31.302948 Schwarz's Bayesian Criterion -52.557580 Tucker and Lewis's Reliability Coefficient 0.677662 Squared Canonical Correlations Factor1 0.79134648 Eigenvalues of the Weighted Reduced Correlation Matrix: Total = 3.79263388 Average = 0.42140376 Eigenvalue Difference Proportion Cumulative 1 3.79263416 3.08253497 1.0000 1.0000 2 0.71009920 0.38480689 0.1872 1.1872 3 0.32529231 0.18462916 0.0858 1.2730 4 0.14066314 0.14536232 0.0371 1.3101 5 -.00469918 0.05392672 -0.0012 1.3089 6 -.05862590 0.23974887 -0.0155 1.2934 7 -.29837476 0.06806674 -0.0787 1.2147 8 -.36644151 0.08147208 -0.0966 1.1181 9 -.44791359 -0.1181 1.0000 Factor Pattern Factor1 grade 0.50039 moist 0.80378 dock 0.35094 acar 0.31165 chey 0.46796 glyc 0.48250 lars 0.62881 cryp 0.19227 psoc -0.31358
Image of page 2
3 The FACTOR Procedure Initial Factor Method: Maximum Likelihood Variance Explained by Each Factor Factor Weighted Unweighted Factor1 3.79263416 2.09922636 Final Communality Estimates and Variable Weights Total Communality: Weighted = 3.792634 Unweighted = 2.099226 Variable Communality Weight grade 0.25039244 1.33387355 moist 0.64606511 2.82516749 dock 0.12315682 1.14033986 acar 0.09712330 1.10758608 chey 0.21898484 1.28053629 glyc 0.23280633 1.30350495 lars 0.39540049 1.65418359 cryp 0.03696612 1.03838122 psoc 0.09833093 1.10906083 Residual Correlations With Uniqueness on the Diagonal grade moist dock acar chey glyc lars cryp psoc grade 0.74961 0.03879 0.26539 -0.04895 -0.04016 -0.13644 -0.11065 0.10079 -0.07909 moist 0.03879 0.35393 0.05992 -0.00050 -0.05314 0.01218 -0.01443 0.00346 0.03205 dock 0.26539 0.05992 0.87684 -0.06937 -0.10422 -0.08733 -0.14967 -0.01647 0.03705 acar -0.04895 -0.00050 -0.06937 0.90288 0.03416 -0.02737 0.03003 -0.04092 -0.10127 chey -0.04016 -0.05314 -0.10422 0.03416 0.78102 -0.00579 0.18574 0.04803 0.06274 glyc -0.13644 0.01218 -0.08733 -0.02737 -0.00579 0.76719 0.09560 -0.20677 -0.15270 lars -0.11065 -0.01443 -0.14967 0.03003 0.18574 0.09560 0.60460 0.03310 0.06318 cryp 0.10079 0.00346 -0.01647 -0.04092 0.04803 -0.20677 0.03310 0.96303 -0.03571 psoc -0.07909 0.03205 0.03705 -0.10127 0.06274 -0.15270 0.06318 -0.03571 0.90167 Root Mean Square Off-Diagonal Residuals: Overall = 0.09361198 grade moist dock acar chey glyc lars cryp psoc 0.12410719 0.03412261 0.12317204 0.05238914 0.08458989 0.11312707 0.10276376 0.08627523 0.08018051
Image of page 3

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
4 The FACTOR Procedure Initial Factor Method: Maximum Likelihood Partial Correlations Controlling Factors grade moist dock acar chey glyc lars cryp psoc grade 1.00000 0.07532 0.32735 -0.05949 -0.05249 -0.17992 -0.16436 0.11863 -0.09620 moist 0.07532 1.00000 0.10757 -0.00088 -0.10106 0.02336 -0.03118 0.00593 0.05673 dock 0.32735 0.10757 1.00000 -0.07796 -0.12594 -0.10647 -0.20556 -0.01793 0.04166 acar -0.05949 -0.00088 -0.07796 1.00000 0.04068 -0.03288 0.04065 -0.04388 -0.11224 chey -0.05249 -0.10106 -0.12594 0.04068 1.00000 -0.00748 0.27030 0.05538 0.07477 glyc -0.17992 0.02336 -0.10647 -0.03288 -0.00748 1.00000 0.14037 -0.24055 -0.18359 lars -0.16436 -0.03118 -0.20556 0.04065 0.27030 0.14037 1.00000 0.04338 0.08557 cryp 0.11863 0.00593 -0.01793 -0.04388 0.05538 -0.24055 0.04338 1.00000 -0.03832 psoc -0.09620 0.05673 0.04166 -0.11224 0.07477 -0.18359 0.08557 -0.03832 1.00000 Root Mean Square Off-Diagonal Partials: Overall = 0.12117739 grade moist dock acar chey glyc lars cryp psoc 0.15883854 0.06347176 0.15665188 0.05972006 0.11846009 0.13993987 0.14742279 0.10039770 0.09675665
Image of page 4
5 The FACTOR Procedure Initial Factor Method: Maximum Likelihood Prior Communality Estimates: SMC grade moist dock acar chey glyc lars cryp psoc 0.33503944 0.45499985 0.23850409 0.10786071 0.25234462 0.31596140 0.41044427 0.11466990 0.17043474 Preliminary Eigenvalues: Total = 3.60340214 Average = 0.40037802 Eigenvalue Difference Proportion Cumulative 1 3.22852154 2.36126459 0.8960 0.8960 2 0.86725695 0.43397155 0.2407 1.1366 3 0.43328540 0.23823513 0.1202 1.2569 4 0.19505027 0.17827358 0.0541 1.3110 5 0.01677670 0.12972367 0.0047 1.3157 6 -.11294697 0.17563764 -0.0313 1.2843 7 -.28858461 0.03966041 -0.0801 1.2042 8 -.32824502 0.07946711 -0.0911 1.1131 9 -.40771213 -0.1131 1.0000 2 factors will be retained by the NFACTOR criterion.
Image of page 5

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 6
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern