Local and State Laws - Local and State Laws One of the...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Local and State Laws One of the long-standing debates within the libertarian movement involves the Fourteenth Amendment. Some argue that it is detrimental to the cause of freedom because it expands the power of the federal government. Others contend that the amendment expands the ambit of individual liberty. I fall among those who believe that the Fourteenth Amendment has been a positive force for freedom. Let’s examine the arguments on both sides. The Fourteenth Amendment reads in part, All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. The first question that arises is: Why do we need government? To protect such fundamental and inherent rights as life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness from violent, anti-social people, such as murderers, rapists, thieves, burglars, and invaders, and to provide an independent forum in which people can peacefully resolve their disputes. Once we accept the legitimacy of government, the next question arises: Why not simply vest government officials with the omnipotent power to carry out their mission? The answer was provided by John Locke and Thomas Jefferson: because when government officials are vested with omnipotent power, they inevitably misuse the power, oftentimes becoming worse than the murderers, rapists, thieves, burglars, and invaders they were charged with protecting people from. So the problem the Framers faced was this: How do we call the federal government into existence but, at the same time, not vest government officials with omnipotent power? Their answer: use a constitution not only to bring the government into existence but also to specify and limit its powers. It is important to constantly bear in mind that, as necessary as government is, at the same time it is the primary threat to the freedom and well-being of the citizenry. That is why government officials, even democratically elected ones, cannot be trusted with omnipotent power and why it is necessary to limit their powers with a constitution. Thus, with respect to freedom, the more restrictions on the power of government, the greater the ambit of individual freedom of the citizenry. That’s in fact why our ancestors enacted the Bill of Rights, which provide express restrictions on the power of federal officials to infringe fundamental rights of the people. Since the Constitution was calling the federal (i.e., national) government into existence,
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/02/2011 for the course LS 101 taught by Professor Elizabethbeninghan during the Fall '10 term at Lappeenranta University of Technology.

Page1 / 6

Local and State Laws - Local and State Laws One of the...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online