This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: people in the crowd. For example, Brutus spoke in a detached way about Caesars death while Antony spoke to the emotions of the crowd by crying and talking about all the good things that Caesar did for Rome. Antonys intelligence was very apparent throughout the play and Brutus appeared to be naive about many things. Antony is smart in the way that he manipulates people to his own advantage. For example, Antony was manipulative in his emotional approach to persuade people to become outraged at Brutus. Brutus appears to be naive throughout the whole play because he believed everyone was as honorable as he. Brutus did not question what he was told, assuming it was always true. In conclusion, in William Shakespeares play, Julius Caesar, there is a major difference between the two characters, Brutus and Mark Antony. The strongest contrast between the two characters appears to be their ability and inability to be both honorable and persuasive....
View Full Document
- Spring '10
- Julius Caesar, Honor, Julius Caesar, Brutus, Antony