Wk 7 d 7 CRT 205 argument E-Val.

Wk 7 d 7 CRT 205 argument E-Val. - 1 Norma Soldana Axia...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Norma Soldana Axia College of University of Phoenix CRT 205 Critical Thinking Anita Tierney November 10, 2006 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Clean Needles Benefit Society Argument premises and conclusions are outlined; Premises; They warrant wider use and federal backing. Conclusion; Our view: Needle exchanges prove effective as Aids counterattack. The student identifies whether the premises support the conclusions; This is an inductive argument; the premises are intended only to be strong that if they are true, then it is unlikely that the conclusion is false. The student identifies whether the premises are reasonable; The premises says there is grounds for wider use of needle exchange and the need of federal backing. If this is true it is reasonable to say. The sentence started with they, so I am assuming they are “needles”. The student explains how he or she came to decisions about article arguments; The sentence started with “they”, so I had to guess who “they” was. There is a join claim of “warrant wider use and federal backing”. The conclusion says prove effective, but there is no hard evidence just “our view” and I am not for sure who “our” is either. But; if the premises
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 6

Wk 7 d 7 CRT 205 argument E-Val. - 1 Norma Soldana Axia...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online