This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: impede traffic, or draw a crowd, the rights of the hearers were not invaded. Roberts maintains that although the religious content of the record would be found offensive by believers of the Catholic faith, the defendants conduct amounts to an attempt to interest the pedestrians in his propaganda and not to cause them harm. Roberts argues that the conduct of the defendant does not amount to a breach of the peace because the defendant did not make profane, indecent, or abusive remarks directed to the person of the hearer. Roberts finds that although the hearers of the record were angry with its content, the defendant did not act aggressively towards them and there was no clear and present danger in Cantwell himself. According to Roberts, a State may not unduly suppress free communication of views, religious or other, under the guise of conserving desirable conditions....
View Full Document
- Fall '08