458Petav.Doughney - People for the Ethical Treatment of...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Doughney The Facts: Who: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (“PETA”) v. Doughney, former internet executive who had 50-60registered domain names at the time the suit was filed Where; United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit When: 2001 What: Plaintiff alleged trademark infringement and unfair competition against the Defendant for the domain name “peta.org” The Issues: Does Doughney use of the domain name “peta.org” for “People Eating Tasty Animals” as a parody for the organization PETA infringe upon trademark rights for PETA and cause a likelihood of confusion for consumers? Doughney claimed the website content with the domain name was a parody (a free speech right) to PETA and therefore not trademark infringement The Holding: The court found Doughney’s use of the domain name likely to cause confusing for consumers and rejected his parody defense. The Rationale:
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
Ask a homework question - tutors are online