This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Macroeconomics 1. Master APE. 20102011. PS7 Prof. Gilles SaintPaul / T.A : Eric Monnet 1 Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device : the ShapiroStiglitz model Set up of the model : An economy 1 is populated with N identical, risk neutral workers. The utility function at each period is a function of wage and e ort as u ( w,e ) = w e , where the e ort e is either null or positive. An unemployed worker received ¯ w with no e ort ( e = 0 ). There is a probability b that a worker will be separated from his job due to reallocation etc. Workers maximize the expected present discounted value of utility with a positive discount rate r . All the model is driven by a simple choice : the workers choice at any point in time is to exert e ort or not. Then, the odds of getting caught if shirking are q . If caught, the worker is red, enters unemployment and waits for a new job. 1) Consider a short, discrete time interval [0,t]. Then explain why in a world without e ort choice and shirking , the asset value of employment over this interval can be written as the following Bellman equation : V E = w.t + exp ( r.t )[ b.tV U + (1 b.t ) V E ] where V U is the value of unemployment. Then show how one can rewrite it as : rV E = w + b ( V U V E ) 2) Given the decision to shirk or not and using the previous question, show that the funda mental asset equation for a shirker is rV S E = w + ( b + q )( V U V S E ) while for a nonshirker : rV N E = w e + b ( V U V N E ) Interpret these equations. 3) Solve for V S E and V N E 4) Using the previous expressions of V S E and V N E , state a simple condition for which the worker will choose not to shirk. Comment. What is the interpretation of this expression if q = 0 ? 5) Then introduce in the model M identical rms. The aggregate production function is 1 from Shapiro C. and Stiglitz J., 1984, 'Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device', American Economic Review 1 Macroeconomics 1. Master APE. 20102011. PS7 Prof. Gilles SaintPaul / T.A : Eric Monnet Q = F ( L ) , where L is the labor force. We assume that F ( N ) > e , that is, full employ ment is e cient. We denote F ( L ) = ˆ w . What is the value of ˆ w given the condition you have found in question 4 ? 6) The key market variable which determines individual rms behavior is V U , the expected utility of an unemployed worker. Show that rV U = ¯ w + a. ( V E V U ) . where a is the job acquisition rate (the probability of obtaining a job per unit of time). Then solve for rV U and rV E . Explain whether a is endogenous or exogenous in the model and show that a = bL/ ( N L ) . 7) State a new nonshirking condition and then modify it to nd the following condition : w ≥ e + ¯ w + e q bN ( N L ) + r we + ¯ w + ( e/q )( b/u + r ) ≡ ˆ w where u = ( N L ) /N Explain why, from this equation, one can conclude that no shirking is inconsistent with full employment....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 01/12/2011 for the course ECO 010023 taught by Professor Mrraggillpol during the Fall '09 term at Paris Tech.
 Fall '09
 MrRaggillpol
 Unemployment

Click to edit the document details