# S30 - 1st December 2004 Munkres § 30 Ex. 30.3 (Morten...

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 1st December 2004 Munkres § 30 Ex. 30.3 (Morten Poulsen). Let X be second-countable and let A be an uncountable subset of X . Suppose only countably many points of A are limit points of A and let A ⊂ A be the countable set of limit points. For each x ∈ A- A there exists a basis element U x such that x ∈ U x and U x ∩ A = { x } . Hence if a and b are distinct points of A- A then U a 6 = U b , since U a ∩ A = { a } 6 = { b } = U b ∩ A . It follows that there uncountably many basis elements, contradicting that X is second-countable. Note that it also follows that the set of points of A that are not limit points of A are countable. Ex. 30.4 (Morten Poulsen). Theorem 1. Every compact metrizable space is second-countable. Proof. Let X be a compact metrizable space, and let d be a metric on X that induces the topology on X . For each n ∈ Z + let A n be an open covering of X with 1 /n-balls. By compactness of X there exists a finite subcovering A n . Now B = S n ∈ Z + A n is countable, being a countable union of finite sets. B is a basis: Let U be an open set in X and x ∈ U . By definition of the metric topology there exists ε &amp;gt; 0 such that B d ( x, ε ) ⊂ U . Choose N ∈ Z + such that 2 /N &amp;lt; ε . Since A N covers X there exists B d ( y, 1 /N ) containing x . If z ∈ B d ( y, 1 /N ) then d ( x, z ) ≤ d ( x, y ) + d ( y, z ) ≤ 1 /N + 1 /N = 2 /N &amp;lt; ε, i.e. z ∈ B d ( x, ε ), hence B d ( y, 1 /N ) ⊂ B d ( x, ε ) ⊂ U . It follows that B is a basis. Ex. 30.5. Let X be a metrizable topological space. Suppose that X has a countable dense subset A . The collection { B ( a, r ) | a ∈ A, r ∈ Q + } of balls centered at points in A and with a rational radius is a countable basis for the topology: It suffices to show that for any y ∈ B ( x, ε ) there are a ∈ A and r ∈ Q + such that y ∈ B ( a, r ) ⊂ B ( x, ε ). Let r be a positive rational number such that 2 r &amp;lt; ε- d ( x, y ) and let a ∈ A ∩ B ( y, r ). Then y ∈ B ( a, r ), of course, and B ( a, r ) ⊂ B ( x, ε ) for if d ( a, z ) &amp;lt; r then d ( x, z ) ≤ d ( x, y ) + d ( y, z ) ≤ d ( x, y ) + d ( y, a ) + d ( a, z ) &amp;lt; d ( x, y ) + 2 r &amp;lt; ε ....
View Full Document

## This note was uploaded on 01/12/2011 for the course MATH 110 taught by Professor Brown during the Fall '08 term at Arizona Western College.

### Page1 / 3

S30 - 1st December 2004 Munkres § 30 Ex. 30.3 (Morten...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online