5-1 Discussion Are Experiments the Gold Standard in Research.docx

  • No School
  • AA 1
  • DoctorAntelope10194
  • 2
  • 75% (8) 6 out of 8 people found this document helpful

This preview shows page 1 - 2 out of 2 pages.

4/2/20 Psy-224 Res II: Sci Investigation 5-1 Discussion: Are Experiments the Gold Standard in Research? When looking at psychological research, it is generally thought that experimental research methods provide the best tool for conducting research. However, some research illustrates that correlational studies and other descriptive methods provide an equally important opportunity for conducting research. After completing this week's readings, discuss the benefits and disadvantages of using an experimental design. In your discussion, be sure to examine how the different research procedures might help to convey results to different audiences. For example, would observational data be easier for individuals outside of research to understand? Or would experimental data provide more easy-to-understand information because it examines a direct cause–effect relationship? Given what you have presented, do you think that experimental research is the gold standard? Why or why not?
Image of page 1
Image of page 2

You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read both pages?

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture