{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}


Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
I. CHOOSING A SYSTEM OF PROCEDURE CB: 1-26; Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 II. CHOOSING THE FORUM: ISSUES OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION IN THE FEDERAL COURTS A. Geographical Limits on the Choice of Forum: In personam jurisdiction; Fed. R. Civ. P. 4; Forms 4, 5, 6 1. Pennoyer v. Neff and the traditional territorial theories of jurisdiction over the person of the defendant: CB 680-700 2. International Shoe and the shift to minimum contacts: CB 700-7 13 3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank and the constitutional requirement of notice to the defendant: CB 825-830; Fed. R. Civ. P.4 0. Long arm statutes: states implement the minimum contacts test: CB 713-719; Fed. R. Civ. P.4 (k) 4. Shaffer v. Heitner and the presence of the defendant’s property in the forum as a basis for personal jurisdiction: CB 781-799 (including note about choice of law) 5. World Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson and refining the minimum contacts analysis: CB 7 19-756 6. Insurance Co. of Ireland v. Compagnie des Bauxites and consent as a basis for personal jurisdiction over the defendant: CB 819-825 7. Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia v. Hall and the theory of general jurisdiction: CB 811-819 1.
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}