peer review

peer review - Katelyn Fish Peer Review The author included...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Katelyn Fish Peer Review The author included all draft points except how she would have done the experiment differently, unless this was just hard for me to find in the article; it didn’t just stand out at me. Although, I did feel that it was a hard point to emphasize in the article considering it wasn’t supposed to be written in a scientific manner. Other than that one point, I feel that she covered the other points on the rubric. After I read through the article, I did understand the conclusion of the study, but it wasn’t as concise as it could have been because I did have prior knowledge since I did do the experiment as well. There was a little bit too much emphasis on other sources that didn’t match up right with what was being said. The other sources of information were sort of randomly dropped into the article, such as the opening paragraph. From an outside stand point I wouldn’t have understood why the study was conducted in the first place. It did mention that it could lead to weight loss, which is a key phrase for some, but it didn’t address why carb
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 2

peer review - Katelyn Fish Peer Review The author included...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online