Optical Networks - _Summary7_90

Optical Networks - _Summary7_90 - Summary 461 Based on the...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Summary 461 Based on the discussion above, it would appear that the wavelength plane ap- proach offers a cheaper alternative to large-scale nonblocking optical switches. How- ever, we did not consider how to optimize the number of add/drop terminations (which would be transponders or O/E interfaces on electrical switch cores). Both Figure 7.13 and Figure 7.14 assume that there are sufficient ports to terminate all WF signals. This is almost never the case, as only a fraction of traffic will need to be dropped, and the terminations are expensive. Moreover, observe that if we indeed do need WF terminations on an electrical switch, the best solution is to use the electrical core configuration of Figure 7.11(a), without having the wavelength plane switches! If we have a total of T terminations, with all of them having tunable lasers, and we would like to drop any of the WF signals, this requires an additional T × WF optical switch between the wavelength plane switches and the terminations, as shown in Figure 7.15. In contrast, with a large nonblocking switch, we would simply connectin Figure 7....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/15/2011 for the course ECE 6543 taught by Professor Boussert during the Spring '09 term at Georgia Institute of Technology.

Page1 / 2

Optical Networks - _Summary7_90 - Summary 461 Based on the...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online