This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: 1 Chapter 6– Solutions 6.1. An engineer is interested in the effects of cutting speed ( A ), tool geometry ( B ), and cutting angle on the life (in hours) of a machine tool. Two levels of each factor are chosen, and three replicates of a 2 3 factorial design are run. The results are as follows: Treatment Replicate A B C Combination I II III    (1) 22 31 25 +   a 32 43 29  +  b 35 34 50 + +  ab 55 47 46   + c 44 45 38 +  + ac 40 37 36  + + bc 60 50 54 + + + abc 39 41 47 (a) Estimate the factor effects. Which effects appear to be large? From the normal probability plot of effects below, factors B , C , and the AC interaction appear to be significant. (b) Use the analysis of variance to confirm your conclusions for part (a). The analysis of variance confirms the significance of factors B , C , and the AC interaction. Design Expert Output Response: Life in hours ANOVA for Selected Factorial Model Analysis of variance table [Partial sum of squares] Sum of Mean F Source Squares DF Square Value Prob > F Model 1612.67 7 230.38 7.64 0.0004 significant A 0.67 1 0.67 0.022 0.8837 B 770.67 1 770.67 25.55 0.0001 C 280.17 1 280.17 9.29 0.0077 AB 16.67 1 16.67 0.55 0.4681 AC 468.17 1 468.17 15.52 0.0012 2 BC 48.17 1 48.17 1.60 0.2245 ABC 28.17 1 28.17 0.93 0.3483 Pure Error 482.67 16 30.17 Cor Total 2095.33 23 The Model Fvalue of 7.64 implies the model is significant. There is only a 0.04% chance that a "Model FValue" this large could occur due to noise. The reduced model ANOVA is shown below. Factor A was included to maintain hierarchy. Design Expert Output Response: Life in hours ANOVA for Selected Factorial Model Analysis of variance table [Partial sum of squares] Sum of Mean F Source Squares DF Square Value Prob > F Model 1519.67 4 379.92 12.54 < 0.0001 significant A 0.67 1 0.67 0.022 0.8836 B 770.67 1 770.67 25.44 < 0.0001 C 280.17 1 280.17 9.25 0.0067 AC 468.17 1 468.17 15.45 0.0009 Residual 575.67 19 30.30 Lack of Fit 93.00 3 31.00 1.03 0.4067 not significant Pure Error 482.67 16 30.17 Cor Total 2095.33 23 The Model Fvalue of 12.54 implies the model is significant. There is only a 0.01% chance that a "Model FValue" this large could occur due to noise. Effects B, C and AC are significant at 1%. (c) Write down a regression model for predicting tool life (in hours) based on the results of this experiment. C A C B A ijk x x . x . x . x . . y 4167 4 4167 3 6667 5 1667 8333 40 + + + + = Design Expert Output Coefficient Standard 95% CI 95% CI Factor Estimate DF Error Low High VIF Intercept 40.83 1 1.12 38.48 43.19 ACutting Speed 0.17 1 1.12 2.19 2.52 1.00 BTool Geometry 5.67 1 1.12 3.31 8.02 1.00 CCutting Angle 3.42 1 1.12 1.06 5.77 1.00 AC 4.42 1 1.12 6.77 2.06 1.00 Final Equation in Terms of Coded Factors: Life = +40.83 +0.17 * A +5.67 * B +3.42 * C 4.42 * A * C Final Equation in Terms of Actual Factors: Life = +40.83333 +0.16667 * Cutting Speed +5.66667 * Tool Geometry +3.41667 * Cutting Angle 4.41667 * Cutting Speed * Cutting Angle...
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 01/16/2011 for the course STAT 430 taught by Professor Stefansteiner during the Fall '03 term at Waterloo.
 Fall '03
 StefanSteiner

Click to edit the document details