EVPP Homework 2 case study

EVPP Homework 2 case study - The Wolf, the Moose, and the...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The Wolf, the Moose, and the Fir Tree: Who Controls Whom on Isle Royale? A case study of trophic interactions by Gary M. Fortier Department of Small Animal Science Delaware Valley College HANDOUT #1 Introduction Isle Royale National Park, the largest island in Lake Superior, provides biologists with a fairly unique system for studying the interactions between different trophic levels. Isle Royale has a rather simple food chain consisting of producers and a single large herbivore that in turn has only a single predator, the gray wolf ( Canis lupus ). The island had a rather large abundance of balsam fir ( Abies balsamea ) until the park was colonized by moose ( Alces alces ) that swam to the island in the early 1900s. After the establishment of this large herbivore, the balsam fir declined from 46% of the overstory in the 19th century to about 5% today. Nearby islands that are inaccessible to moose continue to have a large fir component in their forests; thus the decline of the fir on Isle Royale has been attributed to moose herbivory. Balsam fir is not considered optimal forage for moose but it can comprise up to 59% of their winter diet. Over the last several decades, significant temporal fluctuations have been observed in the densities of the wolf and moose populations and the growth rates of balsam firs. Two hypotheses have been suggested to account for these fluctuations. The primary productivity or "bottom up" hypothesis suggests that plant growth is limited by the energy available to plants which is determined in turn by temperature and precipitation. Additional plant growth means more forage is available--thus herbivores, and ultimately carnivores, should increase in abundance. Alternatively, the trophic cascade or "top down" model predicts that changes in one trophic level are caused by opposite changes in the trophic level immediately above it. For example, a decrease in moose abundance should produce increased plant growth if moose herbivory limits plant growth. Changes in primary productivity would only have a discernible effect on vegetation if higher level interactions had been removed.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/21/2011 for the course EVPP 111 taught by Professor Staff during the Winter '08 term at George Mason.

Page1 / 6

EVPP Homework 2 case study - The Wolf, the Moose, and the...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online