{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Hypothesis Testing1

# Hypothesis Testing1 - MAT2378 Rafal Kulik Version...

This preview shows pages 1–6. Sign up to view the full content.

MAT2378 Rafal Kulik Version 2009/Oct/30 Rafal Kulik

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
MAT2378 Probability and Statistics for the Natural Sciences Hypothesis PART 1 Comments These notes form an introduction to hypotheses testing. They do not correspond to any section in the textbook . The closest section would be 7.10. I’m planning to spend one lectures on this material. Rafal Kulik 1
MAT2378 Probability and Statistics for the Natural Sciences Hypothesis PART 1 Claims and Suspicions Consider the following scenario: person A claims they have a fair coin, but for some reason, person B is suspicious of the claim, believing the coin to be biased in favour of tails. Person B flips the coin 10 times, expecting a low number of heads which intend to use as evidence against the claim . Suppose that there are 4 heads. This is less than expected for a B (10 , 0 . 5) (i.e. 5) which is what we would have from a fair coin; it is more like a coin with P ( head ) = 0 . 4 . But does this really constitute any evidence against the claim? If the person A claims that the coin is fair, then the number of heads, X , has B (10 , 0 . 5) distribution. The value 4 is still close to the mean of the distribution B (10 , 0 . 5) . Furthermore, P ( X = 4) = 0 . 21 , thus even if X ∼ B (10 , 0 . 5) , the event { X = 4 } is still very likely. Thus, it seems that there is no evidence against the claim that the coin is fair. Rafal Kulik 2

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
MAT2378 Probability and Statistics for the Natural Sciences Hypothesis PART 1 B(10.0.5) Prob. Histogram x P(X=x) 0 2 4 6 8 10 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 Rafal Kulik 3
MAT2378 Probability and Statistics for the Natural Sciences Hypothesis PART 1 The sentence it seems that there is no evidence against the claim that the coin is fair is very important. We did not reject the claim that p = 0 . 5 (i.e. the coin is symmetric), but it doesn’t mean that in fact p = 0 . 5 . Accepting , or rather non-rejecting the claim is a very weak statement . To see this why, let’s consider a person C, who claims that our coin from the example above has p = 0 . 3 . Under the claimed B (10 , 0 . 3) , P ( X = 4) = 0 . 22 , thus we do not have enough evidence to reject neither p = 0 . 5 nor p = 0 . 3 . However, rejecting the claim is a very strong statement !!!

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### What students are saying

• As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern