KEY POINTS ECON 385 Spring 2011 Chapters 1-3 (partial)

KEY POINTS ECON 385 Spring 2011 Chapters 1-3 (partial) -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Econ 385 Key Points for Class Topic & Chapter 1: Economic Models, Why Firms Hire Permanent Employees, Principal-Agent Issues, and Heterogeneous vs. Homogeneous Workers and Firms In labor markets (and markets for other factors of production), firms are on the buying/demand side of the market, while individuals/households are on the seller/supply side. If two or more people in a household make joint decisions about labor supply vs. leisure and non-marketed household production activities (such as cooking, cleaning, child care, etc.) then some of the labor supply decisions are joint/household decisions. The demand for labor (and other factors of production) is a derived demand – which means it depends on the demand for the product labor is used to produce. For example, if the demand for automobiles decreases, then the demand for workers in the automobile industry will decrease, other things being equal. In the simplest model of a labor market, firms are typically shown hiring more workers, or more hours of work, as the price of labor decreases. The price of labor is often shown as the wage rate. That is a simplification/generalization, because some workers are paid salaries rather than wages, and others are paid piece rate or commissions and bonuses related to different measures of the worker’s output rather than hours of input. And many workers receive fringe benefits as substantial parts of their total compensation, not just wages. A key point to recognize about all economic models is that they are simplifications of reality. That is done intentionally so that the conclusions of the models will be more general, applying to a wide range of workers, firms, and labor markets. That is the difference between an analytical model and a descriptive model that tries to be very detailed and realistic in appearance (for example, think of the model kits for airplanes, ships, etc.). The purpose of analytical models is to explain and predict outcomes, and models are judged by how well they predict, not by the level of detail and description built into the assumptions used to build the model. The more detailed and specific a model becomes, the less general it will be. How detailed to make the model therefore depends on how general or specific the questions are that you want the model to answer, or at least address. Normative questions often influence the questions that are addressed by positive economic models, and policy recommendations that are at least partly based on the cause and effect or if/then predictions of the positive models. The predictions from a positive model are typically amoral, not based on questions of right or wrong, or what people believe should happen to make the word better and more fair/equitable. So normative issues often depend on comparisons of how much some people or groups are helped or hurt by a policy, not just the total estimates of costs and benefits. However, the compensation principle suggests that Key Points for ECON 385, Spring 2011, M. Watts, Page 1 of 26
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 26

KEY POINTS ECON 385 Spring 2011 Chapters 1-3 (partial) -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online