Whatyouexpectiswhatyouget - AP PSYCHOLOGY SUMMER READING...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
AP PSYCHOLOGY SUMMER READING ASSIGNMENT 2006-2007 Hock, Roger. Forty Studies that Changed Psychology: Explorations into the History of Psychological Research . Prentice Hall. Pages 92-100 [Page 1 of 5] WHAT YOU EXPECT IS WHAT YOU GET Rosenthal, R., SL Jacobson, L. (1966). Teachers' expectancies: Determinates of pupils' IQ gains . Psychological Reports , 19, 115-118. We are all familiar with the idea of the self-fulfilling prophecy. One way of describing this concept is to say that if we expect something to happen in a certain way, our expectation will tend to make it so. Whether self-fulfilling prophecies really do occur in a predictable way in everyday life is open to scientific study, but psychological research has demonstrated that in some areas they are a reality. The question of the self-fulfilling prophecy in scientific research was first brought to the attention of psychologists in 1911 in the famous case of “Clever Hans,” the horse of Mr. von Osten (Pfungst, 1911). Clever Hans was a horse that was famous for being able to read, spell, and solve math problems by stomping out answers with his front hoof. Naturally there were many skeptics, but when a committee of experts tested Hans’s abilities, they were found to be genuinely performed without prompting from Mr. von Osten. But how could any horse (except possibly for Mr. Ed! [1950’s television show that featured a talking horse!]) possess such a degree of human intelligence? Well, a psychologist, O. Pfungst, performed a series of careful experiments and found that Hans was receiving subtle unintentional cues from his questioners. For example, after asking a question, people would look down at the horse's hoof for the answer. As the horse approached the correct number of hoof-beats, the questioners would raise their eyes or head very slightly in anticipation of the horse completing his answer. The horse had been conditioned to use these subtle movements from the observers as signs to stop stomping, and this usually resulted in the correct answer to the question. So, you might ask, how is a trick horse related to psychological research? Well, the Clever Hans findings pointed out the possibility that observers often have specific expectations or biases that may cause them to send covert and unintentional signals to a subject being studied. These signals, then, may cause the subject to respond in ways that are consistent with the observers' bias and, consequently, confirm their expectations. What all this finally boils down to is that an experimenter may think a certain behavior results from his or her scientific treatment of one subject or one group of subjects compared with another. Actually the behavior may result from nothing more than the experimenter's own biased expectations. If this occurs, it renders the experiment invalid. This threat to the validity of a psychological experiment is called the experimenter expectancy effect . Robert Rosenthal, a leading researcher on this methodological issue, has demonstrated the experimenter expectancy
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/31/2011 for the course PSYCH 100 taught by Professor Ryan during the Fall '08 term at CUNY Hunter.

Page1 / 5

Whatyouexpectiswhatyouget - AP PSYCHOLOGY SUMMER READING...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online