Unformatted text preview: -Intentionality is not important to them; miscommunication is not a possibility, not worth wile because intent doesn’t influence the message because the interpreter receives the message the way that he or she will choose. • Present the argument offered by WBJ on behalf of their so-called axiom, “one cannot not communicate.” -Everything assigns meaning to something -“A series of messages exchanged between persons will be called an interaction.” -“According to WBJ what are messages and where are they located? Is it clear where or whom meaning may be located?-The meaning of a message resides in the receiver -Aspects of communication: command aspect-relational, report-content of the message -example-“I hate you” said by a friend vs. someone coming up from the street saying it -Report-content:...
View Full Document
- Spring '08
- WBJ, -Both equate comm, Jackson define communication