Spring_Research_Writing_Rubric

Spring_Research_Writing_Rubric - SOM 301 Research Writing...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: SOM 301 Research Writing Rubric (60 points) Excellent Good Fair Poor Unsatisfactory Points Earned Content 40% The document follows all assignment directions. The three paragraphs contain clear topic sentences, transitional ideas, and recap sentences. Industry and company experts are clearly identified. Analysis is appropriate for a 300-level course. Research requirements are met (minimum of six sources; at least two separate sources per paragraph, etc.). Research is from reliable sources and is properly introduced. [24] The document includes almost all necessary items and guidelines are followed for the most part. There are 1-2 minor errors in presentation of the content. Research requirements are met (minimum of six sources; at least two separate sources per paragraph, etc.). Research is from reliable sources and is properly introduced. [23-20] Several necessary content items are missing or there are several errors in presentation. Research requirements are met (minimum of six sources; at least two separate sources per paragraph, etc.). Research is from reliable sources and is properly introduced. [19-17] Presentation of content contains many errors or omissions. omissions....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/01/2011 for the course SOM 301 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at George Mason.

Page1 / 3

Spring_Research_Writing_Rubric - SOM 301 Research Writing...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online