yg9 - Crime & Deviance Week 6 Remainder of...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Crime & Deviance Week 6 Remainder of lecture Deviance & Crime Crime : Any act that violates a formal normative code that has been enacted by a legally constituted body Strain Theory (Merton, 1957): Excessive deviance is a by-product of inequality within societies that promote certain norms and version of social reality yet provide unequal means of meeting or attaining them, Individuals respond to this strain either by conforming or by changing the goals or means of obtaining goals accepted by society Five potential reactions to the tension between endorsed values (financial success) and the means ( hard work) of achieving them 1. Conformists accepts the means & values as important even if the goal isnt achieved; most people conform 2. Innovators accept values & reject means; seek out new/innovative means to achieve goals 3. Ritualists accept means & reject values; conform even though they do not believe in the values 4. Rebels reject both & substitute new ones 5. Retreatists reject both and replace them with nothing Theory does not adequately explain crimes without financial motivation Deviance & Crime Broken Windows Theory (Zimbardo, 1969): Minor acts of deviance can spiral into severe crime and social decay. Atmosphere and context are keys whether deviance occurs or spirals Ex: Zimbardo placing unoccupied cars w/no license plates, hoods up, otherwise good condition in two neighborhoods -> Palo Alto (wealthy, mostly white) & Bronx (poor, mostly black); what happened? Criminal subcultures Cohen (1955) expanded on Sutherlands differential association and incorporated 5 norms & values that lower-class gang members were socialized in to: Nonutilitarianism Maliciousness Negativism Short-run hedonism Group autonomy Miller believed that it wasnt just the lower class gang members that differed from...
View Full Document

Page1 / 11

yg9 - Crime & Deviance Week 6 Remainder of...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online