Hwk 4 - Economics 230 Fall 2010 Homework - 4 Z.Mukherjee 1....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Economics 230 Homework - 4 Z.Mukherjee Fall 2010 1. Consider an equation to explain salaries of CEOs in terms of annual firm sales, return on equity ( roe , in percentage form) and return on the firm’s stock ( ros , in percentage form): . ) log( ) log( 3 2 1 u ros roe sales salary o + + + + = β (i) State the null hypothesis that, after controlling for sales and roe, ros has no effect on CEO salary. State the alternative that better stock market performances increases a CEO’s salary. (ii) Using the data in CEOSAL1.RAW, the following equation was obtained by OLS: , 00024 . 0 01740 . 0 ) log( 280 . 0 32 . 4 ) log( ) 00054 . 0 ( ) 0041 . 0 ( ) 035 . 0 ( ) 32 . 0 ( ros roe sales salary + + + = . 283 . 0 , 209 2 = = R n By what percentage is salary predicted to increase if ros increases by 50 points? Does ros have a practically large effect on salary? (iii) Test the null hypothesis that ros has no effect on salary against the alternative that ros has a positive effect. Carry out the test at the 10% significance level.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/30/2011 for the course ECON 230 taught by Professor Pm during the Spring '10 term at Conn College.

Page1 / 2

Hwk 4 - Economics 230 Fall 2010 Homework - 4 Z.Mukherjee 1....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online