21 - The Setting of the Parmenides A. A discussion...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The Setting of the Parmenides A. A discussion involving “the young Socrates” and the two Eleatics, Zeno and his teacher Parmenides. B. The Eleatics argued for monism , the view that reality is one : a permanent and unchanging unity. In their view, pluralism , the view that there are many real things, is false. C. Socrates offers the Theory of Forms as an alternative to Eleatic monism. It is put forward as a variety of pluralism that does not give rise to the absurdities that the Eleatics find in pluralistic theories. D. Parmenides and Zeno’s reply is to attack the Theory of Forms, to show that it leads to puzzling consequences of its own. k The Objections to the Theory of Forms A. The Extent of the World of Forms What things are there Forms for? 1. Moral and aesthetic ideals: “just, beautiful, good” 2. Natural kinds: “human being” 3. Natural stuffs: “fire, water” [Socrates expresses uncertainty about groups (2) and (3).] 4. “Undignified” things: “hair, mud, dirt.” [Socrates denies Forms for things in group (4), but
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/31/2011 for the course PHYSICS 110 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '09 term at UC Davis.

Page1 / 2

21 - The Setting of the Parmenides A. A discussion...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online