23 - Critique of Pure Reason Lecture notes, March 3, 1997:...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Critique of Pure Reason Lecture notes, March 3, 1997: Freedom vs. Determinism G. J. Mattey The arguments of the Thesis and Antithesis of the First Antinomy are supposed by Kant to employ a common assumption, that the world is a thing in itself. This assumption is denied by transcendental idealism, which is then claimed to be the key to the solution of the conflict. Without the assumption, neither side is justified in its claims. If the world were a thing in itself, Kant maintained, it would be true that all past times are given (or as he put it more cautiously, "presupposed") in the present time. The existence of the world in the past times is a necessary condition for the existence of the world at this time, or else the present is the beginning of the world and there is no necessary condition for present existence at all. Thus every time is either follows an eariler time or is a first beginning. Since the whole series of time is given (or presupposed), and since it could not be given if the series were infinite, the...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/31/2011 for the course PHILOSOPHY 113 taught by Professor Gerogemattey during the Winter '10 term at UC Davis.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online