a priori argument - a priori argument divine command theory...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
a priori argument divine command theory principle of sufficient reason contingent being infinite backwards causal chain Maximally Evil Being fine-tuning (of laws) Pascal’s wager logical problem of evil problem of non-belief
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
inductive problem of evil transworld depravity soul-making theodicy moral vs. natural evil unknown purpose defense inference to best explanation Paley’s ‘watch in the forest’ regularities of co-presence Regularities of succession contradictory experiences objection quantity vs. efficiency parental mode
Background image of page 2
Moore Shift teleological argument Devil defense quasi-perceptual vs. mystical experience 1. Make a case for or against what you find to be the strongest or most interesting proof for the existence of God. Clearly outline the steps of the proof, explaining its key terms and clearly state its conclusion. Address and evaluate what you take to be its most forceful objections and replies. Is this proof alone sufficient to establish the existence of the traditional monotheistic God? If not, what (if anything) would be sufficient? Explain.
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/31/2011 for the course ARCHITECTU 45310 taught by Professor Drmovahed during the Spring '09 term at Durham College.

Page1 / 9

a priori argument - a priori argument divine command theory...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online