18 - A n a lternative account T here is another possible...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
An alternative account There is another possible reason why Parmenides might have believed that it is impossible to talk or think about what does not exist. One might find another argument for the Central Thesis, inspired by B8, lines 34-35: “Thinking and the thought that it is are the same. For not without what is, in which it is expressed, will you find thinking.” The idea is that thinking just is thinking of something that exists . An argument for CT along these lines might look like this: a. S is thinking S is thinking of something. premise b. S is thinking of something There is something S is thinking of. premise c S is thinking of what does not exist There is nothing S is thinking of premise d . There is nothing S is thinking of S is thinking of nothing. From (b), by contraposition e. S is thinking of nothing S is not thinking. From (a), by contraposition f. S
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

18 - A n a lternative account T here is another possible...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online