Exam1MasterSet(2) - Exam One Lecture Notes 9/1/2009 I. Who...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Exam One Lecture Notes 9/1/2009 I. Who we like and why? A. Everyone tends to want some set of basic characteristics in a mate: 1) Stability 5) Self sufficient 2) Trust 6) Physical characteristics 3) Personality 7) Sense of humor 4) Similar preferences 8) etc. B. Competing Processes- we want to be connected to our mate but then we want our space and our own sense of self II. THE FUNDAMENTAL ASSUMPTION ABOUT INTERPERSONAL ATTRACTION: we are attracted to those whose presence is rewarding to us. A. Direct rewards- all positive consequences we directly obtain from being with someone 1) Material stuff & Gifts 2) Physical contact & Affection 3) Interest & Approval 4) Laughter & Smiling B. Indirect rewards- attraction by association (aka misattraction of arousal)- strong emotions can be relabeled as attraction if an acceptable object is present 1) Examples: (a) Riding a roller coaster (b) Romantic setting (c) Scary movies (d) Spicy food 2) Dutton & Aron, 1974 (Capilano Suspension Bridge ) aka The Shaky Bridge study (a) Bridge in Canada where there is a normal sturdy bridge and then a shaky suspension bridge (b) Researchers are asked to approach people of the opposite sex whom they think are attractive (c) The people are asked to write a story about an image they are shown and afterwards, the researcher gives them their phone number (d) Study was trying to see if being in a stimulating situation (i.e., crossing a shaky suspension bridge) could result in someone being more attracted to another person because they misattributed the arousal from crossing the bridge to the researcher. (i) Results show that those who were chosen off the suspension bridge were twice as likely to make sexual references in the stories they wrote. Sturdy bridge=1.35 approximately Shaky bridge=2.5 approximately (ii) Results also show that the subjects chosen off the suspension bridge were more likely to call the researcher after the study. (12% vs. 50%) (e) Keep in mind that there could have been some extraneous factors: (i) The type of people who chose to cross the suspension bridge may be more outgoing and more likely to call because of that (ii) But other research has also shown that if you create an emotion (arousal or a rush) it can be mistaken for attraction if given the right situation without consciously knowing the emotion is from something else (not the person) III. How do we find that person in the first place?...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/31/2011 for the course HDF 304 taught by Professor Gray during the Spring '08 term at University of Texas at Austin.

Page1 / 68

Exam1MasterSet(2) - Exam One Lecture Notes 9/1/2009 I. Who...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online