exam_micro1_2006

Exam_micro1_2006 - Microeconomics 1 Master 1 APE Exam Michaelmas Term 2006-2007 Brie y answer the following questions 1 Prove that a Giffen good is

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Microeconomics 1, Master 1 APE Exam Michaelmas Term 2006-2007 1. Prove that a Giffen good is necessarily an inferior good. 3. State Hotelling’s lemma. Exercise 1 Forecasters predict there is a 50% probability that the upcoming growing season will be a drought. As- sume Ted is an expected utility maximizer with a Bernoulli function u ( x ) = ln ( x ) : Ted’s initial wealth is equal to zero. Ted initially has the choice between two crops (Potatoes/Strawberry) yielding the following payoffs (in euros): Normal Rain Drought Potatoes 5000 40000 Strawberry 20000 12000 There are constant returns to scale in (the payoffs of) each production. 1. If Ted can only plant one crop, which crop should he plant? 2. Ted can choose any combination of Potatoes and Strawberry crops. Which crop mix should he choose? 3. Assume Ted decides to plant half of his land with each crop. He is offered Strawberry insurance. This insurance costs 5000 euros and pays 10000 euros in the case of a drought. Should Ted buy it?
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/01/2011 for the course ECONOMY 6 taught by Professor Fallahi during the Spring '10 term at Cambridge.

Page1 / 3

Exam_micro1_2006 - Microeconomics 1 Master 1 APE Exam Michaelmas Term 2006-2007 Brie y answer the following questions 1 Prove that a Giffen good is

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online