exam_micro1_2006b

exam_micro1_2006b - Microeconomics 1, Master 1 APE Exam 2...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Microeconomics 1, Master 1 APE Exam 2 22 January 2007 Please write legibly and show your work clearly. 2. Write down and comment Slutsky equation. 3. Under which conditions a preference relation is said to be rational? 4. State Shepard’s lemma. Exercise 1 Fred is an expected utility-maximizing driver who likes to speed. He can either exert self-restraint (at a high effort) and therefore drive safely, or self-indulgence (with low effort) and drive recklessly. Let high effort be represented by e = 1 and low effort by e = 0 : Suppose further that Fred’s preferences over effort and wealth are represented by the utility function u ( w ; e ) = p w 5 e : Suppose Fred has an initial wealth of 1000 euros . If Fred gets in an accident, he incurs a 500-euro loss . The probability that Fred gets in an accident depends on his effort level: if e = 0 ; Pr f accident g = 2 3 ; if e = 1 ; Pr f accident g = 1 4 : Assume there are no other costs associated with the accident besides the 500 euros. 1. Will Fred drive safely or recklessly? From now on, it is assumed that Fred drives recklessly, i.e.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/01/2011 for the course ECONOMY 6 taught by Professor Fallahi during the Spring '10 term at Cambridge.

Page1 / 3

exam_micro1_2006b - Microeconomics 1, Master 1 APE Exam 2...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online