This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: But the epistemological question is about our reasons for thinking that any claim based on that perceptual experience is true. Is the mere fact that we have such an experience a reasons to think that claims based on that experience are true? Even if not a conclusion reasons is the perceptual experience any reason at all? It can count as a reason only if the relevant first principle can be justified. But Reid claims that no arguments can be given for first principles. Where does that leave us?...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 02/02/2011 for the course CHEM 152 taught by Professor Chiu during the Spring '08 term at University of Washington.
- Spring '08