Sacramento+Meter+Stories - September 5, 2004 The Sacramento...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
September 5, 2004 The Sacramento Bee Water meter bill in limbo The governor will decide whether capital residents must use the devices. By Stuart Leavenworth When it comes to guzzling water, California's capital is a big Humvee. Walk down the sidewalk and you see sprinkler water flowing into street gutters. Surveys show Sacramento uses about twice as much water per capita as others in the arid West. That could change, albeit slowly, if Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signs legislation requiring Sacramento and eight other cities to install water meters within 20 years. The legislation, AB 2572, has passed the Assembly and Senate and is supported by environmental groups and Southern California water agencies. Many Republicans endorsed the legislation and only three Democrats voted against it. Two of those happened to be from Sacramento - Assemblyman Darrell Steinberg and Sen. Deborah Ortiz. Given that political calculus, many observers expect Schwarzenegger to sign the bill, which would require Sacramento, Modesto and seven other cities to install meters by 2025 and start charging residents for the volume of water they consume. "In a period of increasing water shortages, it is very hard to argue that meters should not be adopted," said Phil Isenberg, a former assemblyman and Sacramento mayor. Still, a meter mandate poses some hard choices for a GOP governor who, in speaking to the Republican National Convention last week, touted individual liberties and the idea that families know how to spend their money better than the government. "It is a not a slam dunk," said Ron Stork of Friends of the River, a supporter of the legislation. So far, he said, the governor has given no indication of whether he will sign the bill. The governor's press office on Friday declined to comment. If the governor approves the legislation, Sacramento would need to add meters to about 110,000 homes - one of the larger retrofit programs attempted nationwide. The state mandate comes with no money attached, so the city would need to pay for the program through rate increases. City utility officials did not return phone calls, but previously have estimated the costs at $121 million, or more than $1,000 per home. They also claim they would need $128 million to relocate backyard water mains to front yards, which would make the meters easier to read and maintain. Although conservation doesn't come cheap, supporters note that other cities, including Fresno and Roseville, are installing meters at about half of Sacramento's projected costs. They also say that, with a 20-year grace period, Sacramento could combine the work with other upgrades of streets and plumbing, reducing the overall costs.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
"They don't want to dig the same hole twice," said Stork. Most municipal water systems long have charged households for the water they use, but
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 6

Sacramento+Meter+Stories - September 5, 2004 The Sacramento...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online