Outsourcing - Outsourcing and the World Trade Organization...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Outsourcing and the World Trade Organization Jeffrey M. Perloff * One of the most hotly debated current issues concerns free trade and outsourcing. For years, protesters have made it very difficult for countries to hold meetings of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The WTO’s objective is to promote free trade among its 151 member countries. World trade was $11.8 trillion in 2006. As part of this agreement, member countries are supposed to remove many domestic distortions, such as by eliminating subsidies to farmers and others. Protesters complain that the WTO contributes to world poverty and pollution, and they object to outsourcing jobs. (A firm outsources if it retains others to provide services that the firm would otherwise perform itself.) Background The U.S. Constitution guarantees free trade among the 50 U.S. states. However, free trade occurs between the United States and other countries only if the countries agree to it. International trade has become increasingly important for the U.S. economy. Today, trade is over a quarter of the U.S. gross domestic product, up from 10% in 1970—the largest such increase of any major developed country over this period. The United States has signed free-trade agreements—which eliminate or reduce tariffs and quotas—and liberalized rules on foreign investment to increase trade. The North American Free Trade Agreement with Canada and Mexico has been in effect for over a decade. The United States also has pacts with Singapore, Israel, Jordan, and Chile. In 2004, it established agreements with Australia, Bahrain, and Morocco. In 2005, the United States signed the Central American Free Trade Agreement (with Nicaragua, El Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, and Guatemala). The United States signed an agreement with Peru in 2007. Arguments for and Against The basic result from economic theory is that in a perfectly competitive market, a country that engages in free trade gains enough to improve everyone’s lot (see the discussion of trade in Chapter 9 and of comparative advantage in Chapter 10). Business and jobs lost in one sector are more than offset by gains in other sectors. Nonetheless, the WTO has been attacked from both the left and the right. Many U.S. opponents criticize restrictions on the United States’ ability to subsidize domestic groups. Some people complain because the WTO, a foreign body, is empowered to enforce global commerce rules with the imposition of economic sanctions on member countries, although a country can withdraw from the agreement. WTO foes primarily raise three economic objections. They contend that (1) free trade
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 4

Outsourcing - Outsourcing and the World Trade Organization...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online