This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Sheet1 Page 1 THE CRITIQUE OF THE PANAMA CANAL: The Crisis in Historical Perspective In 1825, a group of American businesspeople announced the formation of a canal building company, with interes constructing a canal system across the Isthmus. This project was to take place in an area now called Panama. Th endeavor was filled with controversy. Though the canal itself was not built until the early 1900's every step toward building and ownership, was saturated with difficulty. Walter LaFeber illustrates the dilemmas in a historical analy his work he states five questions that address the significance of the Panama Canal to United States. This paper discuss the historical perspective of the book's author, address pertinent three questions and give a critique of La work, The Panama Canal. For proper historical analysis one must understand the importance of the Canal. The Panama Canal and the Can (the immediate area surrounding the Canal) are important areas used for trade. Even before the canal was built t to large ports on both sides of the Isthmus. Large amounts of cargo passed through the Isthmus by a railroad tha connected the two ports. The most important cargo was the gold mined in California before the transcontinental r was completed in the United States. It has strategic significance because of its location, acting as a gateway con the Pacific and Atlantic oceans. This allows for rapid naval deployment between fleets in either ocean. These two make the Panama Canal very important in the region....
View Full Document
- Spring '08