This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: Mich 2010 Mathematical Finance: Short Solutions 3 15. Apply the Law of One Price to some suitable portfolios. The inequalities for the put option are ( Ke rT S ) + ≤ P ≤ Ke rT . For the final inequality compare portfolios containing put options and some cash. 16. Adapt the argument for the American call option i.e. compare exercising the call at T 1 with selling short. 17. Buy the calls with strike prices K 1 and K 3 and sell two calls with strike K 2 . Whatever the stock price S ( T ) the return is nonnegative so the portfolio requires a positive amount to setup. Buying the K 1 and K 3 puts and selling two K 2 puts also guarantees a positive return so P 2 ≤ ( P 1 + P 3 ) / 2. 18. Start with putcall parity for both parts: (a) is not true (think about large K and small S ), (b) is true. 19. Modify the argument used to establish Theorem 1.3 (b). 20. The initial odds have ∑ (1 + o i ) 1 = 1 so there is no arbitrage. With natural labels for the three new bets we find o 12 = 1...
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 02/04/2011 for the course MATH 3301 taught by Professor Dri.m.macphee during the Spring '10 term at Durham.
 Spring '10
 DrI.M.MacPhee
 Math, Inequalities

Click to edit the document details